Friday, July 27, 2012

theglobe.com Response Paper Assignment Task Endeavor Project Homework


            In the mid-90s, the world got its first glimpse into the huge boom, or big bang, that the Internet began to experience as it was on the rise to becoming a prevalent part in many peoples’ daily lives.  In the business and stock world, the period between 1995 and 2000 is known as the dot-com bubble, where a tremendous amount of money was invested in technology and Internet-based business ventures.  This period of time was saturated with a great deal of Internet startup companies that ranged from primitive web browsers and search engines to auction and shopping sites, plus gaming and early social media sites.  On the business side, the stock market saw many publicly traded sites who’s stocks boomed from just a few dollars each to well over one hundred dollars in just a few days.  A few years later as 1999 and 2000 came around, it seems that just as fast as such startups came into existence, many of their stocks crashed dramatically and many went out of business.  A good example of such a dot-com bubble startup that went from rags to riches then back to rags between 1995 and 2000 is the early social media and gaming entity known as theglobe.com.
            Stephan Paternot and Todd Krizelman founded theglobe.com during their undergraduate years at Cornell in 1994.  Within a year they had a team of employees and by 1998 their company began being publicly traded.  According to an interview by ABC Australia, Steph Paternot had high hopes and revolutionary feelings at startup, but now he’s worth no more than your average Joe.  The company’s shares opened at $9 a piece and boomed to $97 within their first day of trading.  The 23 year-olds were worth close to $100 million for a relatively short period of time, as their stocks closed out at just under 20 cents apiece.  Evidently, their business idea was not self-sustainable, as it seems that they attracted millions to their business but never worked out how to turn a profit.
            You may ask, “what could they have done differently?”  For one, they could have done something that would have made them a sustainable income!  Theglobe.com was a social media site that featured chat rooms and customizable pages that were each geared toward a specific interest.  In addition, the site featured a host of video games and other social things to do.  It seems that as long there is web traffic, there will be advertisers; and where there are advertisers, there are advertising dollars.  Not a bad plan.  However, this means that the website must stay up-to-date and prevalent in millions of people’s Internet surfing routines on a regular basis.  At the time of conception, I suppose there was no way of knowing, but looking back it seems obvious that it would be just another fad that comes and goes.  Even from the beginning, however, as the ABC Australia bit shows, some analysts saw that is was a business based on hype that held no sustainable business plan, and therefore was sure to pass.  In addition, it did not help that in 1999 the site got some bad press as CNN filmed Paternot at a Manhattan nightclub at his financial peak wearing shiny leather pants and dancing on a table.  He was coined “the CEO in plastic pants” and was passed off as a symbol of the excess of young dot-com millionaires at the time.
            During the dot-com bubble, investors were extremely excited about the potential of this new medium for business known as the Internet and all of the brilliant and booming startup companies available for investments and hopeful returns.  It is hard to say if this boom proved to be overall beneficial in the long run, but it surely did have an impact on today’s marketplace.  Many Internet giants got their start during this bubble including amazon.com, eBay, and Google.  It seems that on the Internet, the idea of major corporations ran their course similar to how it happened in the physical world, but in a highly condensed time frame.  By this I mean that at its conception, the Internet hosted a multitude of small, independent businesses with specialized purposes and new, original ideas.  Within a few years, many smaller businesses were weeded out by competitors, which grew dramatically in size and popularity.  As these now mega-sites continued to grow, they bought out competitors and a variety of smaller startup sites, which they would add to their brand and domain.  This process, to me, is very reminiscent of how startups and already-established businesses are bought up by giant conglomerate corporations that feed on their competition and thrive on their spread and sheer domination.  We see many examples of this today, with just the first one coming to mind being Time Warner.  This company came about with the fusion of Warner Communications and Time, Inc., plus Turner Broadcasting Systems, Inc.  The spread of this corporation includes subsidiaries that are making Hollywood movies, broadcasting original television shows, providing homes with cable and internet services, plus much more.  Another major one is NBC Universal.  With all its subsidiaries, this company is feeding both our entertainment and our news sources.  Just to name a few functions, they make movies, have branded theme parks, give us local, national, and political news, and a whole lot more.  Okay, digressive rant over.  The dot-com bubble in the latter half of the 1990s surely had lasting effects on our business market and especially Internet business market today.
            Many investors saw how Internet businesses were on a dramatic rise and were more than eager to invest their money with the hopes of seeing plenty of returns for years to come.  Did they learn their lesson?  Will this sort of thing ever happen again?  It seems that to an extent it already is.  As new media develop, there will be folks ready to capitalize, and thus plenty of exciting booms for investors for years to come.  Just recently with the advent of Smartphones and tablet computers, nearly every established entity has an “app”.  In just its first year, Apple sold over 1.5 billion apps in their App Store.  As more people across the globe obtain this new and exciting technology, they will continue to purchase such digital perks that improve their experiences with their various devices.
            So the dot-com bubble happened.  We certainly see a host of surviving entities as well as improvements in the way business is conducted over the Internet.  With new technology, it takes some time to work out kinks and make improvements based on how people interact with it in real-life applications.  For example, making payments online is much more safe and secure than in the past and many Internet-based businesses are very efficient and customer friendly.  Websites are far more organized, employ sleek designs, and look very professional.  Some websites are indeed very fascinating and have revolutionized how we obtain information, such as Google, YouTube, Wikipedia, and more.  With the freewheeling nature of the Internet, it must also be noted that in recent times it has been much more governed.  Many file sharing websites have been shut down and videos removed from the web due to copyright laws and other implications.  It is hard to say whether the economic impact of “bursting the bubble” is outweighed by the improvements that came about as a result.  Regardless, it is certain that the virtual interconnected web we refer to as the Internet is here to stay, at least for a while, and where there are people, there will be commerce.  Commerce is good.

ABC Australia video:

Thursday, July 12, 2012

Why isn't this a better blog?


As of right meow, I would not consider this blog very marketable.  If it were to go viral, I would be very surprised and wonder what is wrong with the world [wide web].  To draw a crowd, it would need a purpose other than to complete class assignments.  It would need some sort of specialized area of focus, a mission statement, and probably some sort of social element.  While viewers are able to comment on my posts here, it would make sense for users to be able to create threads in a dedicated corner of the blog.  Throughout the rest of the blog, there would need to be new content being updated continually.  To do this, I would either need a dramatically larger amount of free time, a subject that I’m very dedicated to, and realistically, probably a team of trusted contributors.  That way, the team could constantly search for more content and bring the best of what they find to our popular blog to engage users.  The specialization of the blog, whatever it may be, would need to have a variety of subtopics within the broader scope to engage a wider variety of users and to make it a more easy-to-navigate, user-friendly blog.  That being said, what should the topic be?
The Great Hamburger Blog? Vintage Audiophiles Galore? Mathematical statistics and accords of every Phish song being played live and when? Oh wait, that exists.  The best live "Dark Star" and other songs by the Grateful Dead? that exists too.